Coverage of unions and artificial intelligence in voice and performance work tends to center almost entirely on SAG-AFTRA, understandably, given the scale of its 2024 to 2025 video game strike and the size of the US market it covers. But SAG-AFTRA isn't the only performers' union fighting this fight, and it isn't fighting it the same way everywhere. UK Equity and Canada's ACTRA have each been negotiating their own AI protections, through different legal systems, different industry structures, and different leverage, and a voice actor who works across borders, or who simply wants to understand how this fight is playing out globally, should know what each one has actually won.
UK Equity: Fighting Policy as Much as Contracts
Equity, the UK's performers' union, has spent much of 2025 and 2026 fighting on two fronts at once: individual production contracts, and national copyright policy itself. The policy fight centered on a UK government proposal that would have let AI developers train models on copyrighted creative work by default, unless a rights holder actively opted out, a structure that in practice would have let companies scrape performers' recorded voices and performances without asking first. Equity's general secretary did not mince words about what that would mean in practice.
"Legalising theft."
That campaign had a real result: the UK government reversed course on the opt-out proposal in March 2026, after sustained pressure from Equity and other creative-sector organizations. Separately, on the contract side, Equity has also pushed for industrial action over digital scanning on set and has campaigned for a share of any payment AI companies make for licensed access to its members' archives, arguing that if an AI company pays a producer for access to old performance footage or recordings, some of that money needs to flow back to the performers whose work it actually is, not just to whoever currently holds the rights.
ACTRA Canada: Writing AI Directly Into the Contract
ACTRA, the Canadian union covering performers including voice actors, took a more direct contractual route. Its Independent Production Agreement for 2025 to 2027, ratified by members in January 2025, added two entirely new sections addressing artificial intelligence: Part G, covering live-action and theatrical animation productions, and Part H, covering other animation work, which is where most Canadian voice-over-for-animation work actually lives. Both sections define 'synthetic performers' and 'synthetic voices' explicitly as digitally generated assets, and both require a producer to get a performer's informed consent and pay fair compensation before using that performer's voice or likeness to create one.
"A historic deal that reflects our values, addresses current needs and sets us up for a stronger future together."
Both unions, in other words, got somewhere real, through entirely different routes suited to their own country's industry structure. That difference in approach is worth sitting with for a moment before looking at how it maps against the US fight most voice actors already know.
The practical difference from SAG-AFTRA's approach is worth naming plainly: ACTRA built its protection directly into the production agreement that governs day-to-day Canadian work, requiring producers to notify the union whenever they intend to use a generative AI synthetic performer at all, rather than relying on a separate, standalone AI-specific agreement layered on top. That makes the protection harder to route around on a Canadian production, since it isn't an optional add-on; it's part of the base contract every signatory producer already works under. The underlying concern driving all three unions is the same one covered in the legal landscape around AI voice likeness: a performer's voice being used to create something they never actually agreed to.
Three Unions, Three Different Tools
None of these approaches is strictly better than another; they reflect real differences in how each country's entertainment industry and legal system actually work. The US fight ran through a historic strike because SAG-AFTRA's leverage comes largely from its ability to withhold labor at scale. Equity's fight ran through public policy because UK copyright law itself was the thing actually at risk of changing nationally, for every creative worker, not only performers represented by a single union. ACTRA's fight ran through direct contract language because Canada's production agreement structure gave it a workable lever to simply write the protection into the document everyone already signs.
What This Actually Means If You Work Across Borders
A voice actor who takes union and non-union work across the US, UK, and Canadian markets is, whether they think of it this way or not, operating under three separate and genuinely different sets of AI protections, with different definitions of what counts as a protected use, different consent requirements, and different enforcement mechanisms. SAG-AFTRA's own AI agreement covers US union work specifically and doesn't automatically extend protection to a Canadian or UK production, even one with an American client attached. A voice actor doing animation work for a Canadian studio is covered by ACTRA's Part G and H language if that studio is an ACTRA signatory; the same voice actor doing UK work is subject to whatever Equity has negotiated there, which currently leans more on broader policy and individual contract terms than a single unified AI agreement.
↗ Try the tool
Rate Calculator
AI consent and usage terms increasingly affect what a fair rate for a job actually looks like, especially across different countries' union rules. The Rate Calculator helps you price a job honestly once those terms are part of the conversation.
Open Rate Calculator →The practical takeaway isn't that you need to become an expert in three separate legal systems before accepting any international work. It's that 'AI protections' is not one single, portable standard, and a contract clause that looks protective on a US job may mean something different, or nothing at all, on a Canadian or UK one. Reading the specific AI and synthetic-voice language in whatever contract is actually in front of you, rather than assuming it matches whatever you're used to from a different market, is the one habit that actually transfers across all three, the same careful-reading discipline covered in understanding your contracts and usage rights.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a voice actor be a member of SAG-AFTRA, Equity, and ACTRA at the same time?
Yes, dual and multiple union membership across these particular unions is common for performers who work across borders regularly, though each union has its own specific eligibility, dues, and reciprocal agreement rules that are worth checking directly with the union rather than assuming.
Do any of these protections apply to non-union voice actors at all?
Not directly. Union AI protections apply to work covered under that union's specific agreements with signatory producers. A non-union voice actor's only real protection against an AI usage they didn't agree to is whatever is explicitly written into their own individual contract, which is exactly why reading that language carefully matters even more without a union behind you.
Which union currently has the strongest AI protections for voice actors?
They're not easily ranked against each other, since each addresses a different piece of the problem, consent and compensation for synthetic voice use, in ACTRA's case, broader training-data copyright policy in Equity's, and a dedicated, strike-won agreement in SAG-AFTRA's. The honest answer is that none of the three alone covers everything a voice actor might reasonably want protected.
Sources and Further Reading
- PoliticsHome, Equity's Paul W Fleming: Labour plan for AI and creatives will 'legalise theft': the source of the 'legalising theft' quote.
- Broadcast Now, Government backs away from opt-out copyright law for AI training: the UK government's March 2026 reversal following the Equity-led campaign.
- ACTRA National, Canadian Performers Ratify New Independent Production Agreement: the ratified 2025 to 2027 IPA and its synthetic performer provisions.
- Playback, ACTRA sets tentative deal with Canadian producers for IPA: the source of the Marie Kelly quote and background on the negotiation.
- ACTRA Toronto, Artificial Intelligence Resources: the union's own explanation of the Part G and Part H synthetic performer and synthetic voice provisions.
Corrections
This article describes union agreements, campaigns, and public statements as reported by the sources above as of October 2026. Union agreements are renegotiated on fixed cycles and specific terms can change at renewal. Spot an error? Tell us through the contact page and we will correct it with a note.